Colleen Jordan
"2006 Election Results"
"2006 Campaign Contributions"
2. Governments are frequently faced with difficult choices between hard monetary costs and potential health and social costs. Please indicate how you would rate the relative importance of these on the scale below.
Hard Costs, Taxes
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
Social & Health Concern
Comments: Social and health concerns are always a major consideration of mine. I am unsure of how to mark this scale to reflect that.
3. It is important to set goals. Would you support a general initiative to make your community the greenest in Ontario (or one of the greenest in Canada)?
Great idea
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
Dumb Idea
4. Do you accept the conclusion of the Canadian Medical Association that air pollution such as currently exists in Durham Region is an immediate health hazard which is contributing to reduced lifespan and quality of life. Read conclusions from the CMA report - No Breathing Room .
Strongly Agree
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
Strongly Disagree
5. Do you agree that any exposure to carcinogenic substances should be avoided at all costs?
Strongly Agree
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
Strongly Disagree
6. Do you accept that governments should apply the ‘precautionary principle’. i.e. governments should severely restrict any initiatives where there is a likelihood of waste discharges, emissions or other side-effects where the harmful effects are either unknown or poorly understood?
Strongly Agree
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
Strongly Disagree
7. Do you accept that pollution is cumulative and that the harmful potential of all developments (both new and existing) needs to be evaluated in the context of the environment as a whole rather than each development individually?
Strongly Agree
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
Strongly Disagree
8. Would you support a local by-law to extend the provincial ban on cosmetic pesticide use to include golf courses and other recreational properties not currently included?
Strongly Support
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
Strongly Oppose
9. As a councillor, would you seek restrictions on any new developments (industrial, commercial, residential, etc.) which do not meet exceptional standards for air and water pollution abatement?
Severe restrictions
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
Loosen existing restrictions
Comments: Sometimes this may be difficult due to current regulations under legislation such as the Planning Act, building code etc. Municipal Governments may not have the ability to enforce the restriction.
10. Would you favour high density residential or mixed development at transportation hubs (particularly GO stations) in order to maximize the population near these hubs and reduce the use of private cars?
Strongly Favour
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
Strongly Oppose
11. In order to mitigate the detrimental affects of urban sprawl (servicing costs, transit costs, etc.) would you support a general increase in zoning densities in order to create more compact communities? This is in line with policies of the provincial government.
Strongly Support
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
Strongly Oppose
12. As a councillor, would you support the protection of Class 1 farmland from further urban development except in exceptional circumstances?
Highest Priority
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
Crazy Idea
13. As a councillor, would you support changes to zoning regulations to require buffer zones around environmentally sensitive areas (e.g. Second Marsh) to protect them from potentially high impact developments (such as the proposed ethanol plant)? Only minimal impact development would be allowed within these buffer zones.
Strongly Support
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
Strongly Oppose
14. Would you support a tree protection by-law in which a permit would be required to cut any mature tree (even on private or development land) and, that even when permitted, replacement trees would have to be planted or fees paid to a municipal environmental fund in compensation? For information on Toronto's by-law, click here .
Strongly Support
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
Strongly Oppose
Comments: Currently Ajax is developing an Urban Forest Strategy that will seek to increase our urban tree canopy. I am very supportive of this direction.
15. Would you advocate the expansion of local transit routes and their frequency, accompanied by promotions to encourage people to leave their cars at home?
Highest Priority
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
No expansion required
16. Would you support an acquisition policy which required all newly purchased municipal service vehicles to be 'green', to the extent that such vehicles are available?
Zero emissions
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
Strongly Oppose
Comments: Ajax has over the past number of years right sized their vehicles and purchased hybrid models. I have been very supportive.
17. Would you support a policy which required all companies with long term contracts to the municipality (e.g. garbage & electrical services) to use 'green' vehicles where such vehicles are available?
Zero emissions
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
Strongly Oppose
Comments: Green procurement policies are something that I would support being implemented.
18. Car idling creates pollution and greenhouse gases and also costs drivers money in fuel and wear and tear to their engines. As a councillor, would you support a ban on idling for longer than a few minutes as they have done in Toronto and other GTA communities? See Natural Resources Canada 'Idle-Free Zone' .
High Priority
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
Crazy Idea
Comments: Yes. I have been very supportive. We have implemented idle free policies for our fleet and recently Ajax endorsed an education program for public awareness and declaration of idle free zones.
19. Drive-throughs create traffic congestion, encourage idling and result in reduced physical activity. As a councillor, would you support restrictions on drive-throughs?
Ban Drive-throughs
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
No restrictions
Comments: In Ajax, I brought forth a motion that was supported by Council to develop policies to restrict our drive throughs. We have also banned drive throughs in our downtown area which was an election issue in 2003 (which I supported) and likley was a factor in my defeating a long serving incumbent.
20. Do you support the completion of Hwy 407 east to Hwy 35/115 as a divided, controlled-access highway?
As Quickly as Possible
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
Never
21. The environmental imperative strongly indicates that we need to reduce our reliance on private vehicles, and to this end we need to question all major road construction projects. As an alternative to the current design of the 407, would you support downgrading the 407 extension to 'as-needed' improvements to the existing road alignments, and widenings only as the specific need is demonstrated?
Strongly Support
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
Strongly Oppose
22. Would you support an end to all regional & local planning for an airport in north Pickering and encourage the federal government to stop further demolitions and return the land to agricultural uses where still practical? Land over Landings website.
Return Airport Lands to Agriculture
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
Build Airport Now
23. As a councillor, will you seek to stop the proposed EFW / garbage incinerator in Clarington?
Yes, Stop it
No, Build it
Undecided
24. The alternative to incineration and/or landfill is aggressive waste diversion - "Reduce, Reuse & Recycle". What level of diversion do you believe is feasible?
65%
70%
75%
80%
85%
90%
95%
100%
Comments: I asked the consultant at one of their presentations and they (Golder Assoc. I think) stated 90% would be possible if EPR was implementd.
25. Given your answer to the previous question, when should we aim to achieve that diversion goal?
2010
2015
2020
2025
2030
2035
2040
Comments: As soon as possible.
26. Would you support an initiative which required all public events on public property to be 'zero garbage' as they currently do in Markham? All materials at such events are required to be recycled and there are no 'garbage' containers. (See Markham's policy. )
Strongly Support
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
Strongly Oppose
27. Municipal councils are the owners of all our local power utilities (Whitby Hydro, Veridian, Oshawa Public Utilities). Would you be prepared to use that leverage to insist that these utilities be 'greener'?
Using more fuel efficient vehicles
High Priority
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
Bad Idea
Accelerate the implementation of 'smart' metering
High Priority
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
Bad Idea
Assist with energy efficiency retrofits
High Priority
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
Bad Idea
Provide incentives for local power generation (solar, wind)
High Priority
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
Bad Idea
Insist that more green energy is available on the local grid
High Priority
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
Bad Idea
28. The vast majority of homes are heated by burning either gas or oil which creates significant greenhouse gases. In order to conserve energy and reduce global warming, municipalities could be encouraging the use of ground source and other high efficiency heat pumps by providing financing of the capital costs through the municipal lending authority, provided the savings more than covered the carrying costs. Residents would repay the loans on their individual tax bills from the savings on their heating bills. Would you support such an initiative?
Strongly Support
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
Strongly Oppose
Comments: I would like to learn more about possible incentives- what is possible and what has worked elsewhere.
29. The Environmental Assessment process for the Clarington EFW / Incinerator has been contentious. Rate the process from 10 (very good) to 1 (very poor).
EFW Process was Very Good
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
Process was Bad
Comments: I was not happy with a number of issues and stated these concerns during the process.
30. For future projects, would you insist on a more open, consultative and responsive approval process?
Strongly Support
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
Strongly Oppose
Comments: I was concerned that there was no support for my motion to hold an open house on the incinerator for West Durham residents.
31. Would you support an initiative to make the position of Regional Chair elected by voters?
Yes, by Direct Public Election
No, Continue as at Present (appointed by Regional Council)
Undecided / Don't Know
Some Other Option - Please Describe
Comments: We know the public also shares this opinion as evidenced by referendums in Ajax, Pickering and Clarington. It is unfortunate that Regional Councillor's have not reflected the public opinion when given the opportunity to vote on this matter.
32. Municipal elections generally have very low turnouts. There are many causes for this, but in an effort to spark greater interest and generate better funded campaigns, would you support tax credits for donations to municipal candidates as they do in Toronto and other communities? (See Toronto's rebate policy. )
Strongly Support
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
Strongly Oppose
Comments: Yes. We put this into effect in Ajax a number of years ago. I have been very supportive of this measure. We also disclose candidate's financial contributions on the Town's website, as a means to inform our residents about these matters.
33. A common complaint about municipal elections is that there are too few opportunities for voters to meet and question candidates. Would you support subsidies to community groups who are willing to sponsor non-partisan all-candidates meetings - these subsidies would be used to rent halls and generate appropriate publicity?
Strongly Support
9
8 7
6
5
4
3
2
Strongly Oppose
Comments: We have offerred opportunities and space. The Community Development Council ran an all candidate's debate in our Town Hall during a recent by election but the voter turnout was still dismal.
34. Would you support changes to the sign by-laws to severely limit both the number and size of election signs on public property (boulevards, etc.)? Signs on private property (with the owner’s permission) would be unaffected.
Ban signs on public property
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
No Restrictions
35. Should election signs be banned from garbage? In other words should they be required to be recycled?
Signs Must be Recycled
No Restrictions
Undecided / Don't know
Other - Please Specify
Comments: My signs have been used over and again as they are made from a durable plastic.
36. In the 1950s municipal elections were held every year. Politicians were responsive to citizens because they were never very far from the next election. Since then the terms for councillors have gradually increased, and in the last election, terms were extended to 4 years. The rationale is that politicians need time to get things done and some of these things might be unpopular ...but necessary. What do you think is the most appropriate term?
One Year
Two Years
Three Years
Four Years
Five Years
Comments: I believe that in Ajax the four year term will allow us to make progress on a number of issues. On the other hand at the Region, I may have prefferred to see a three year term hoping that more like minded politicians were elected Regionally, so that progressive environmental and social policies could be developed. Also the matter of an elected Regional Chair may could be dealt with differently.
37. General Comments: Thanks for the opportunity to complete the survey. Kindly keep me posted as to other initiatives your group will be involved in. Sincerely, Colleen.
Election Signs
Hi Colleen,
Well done questionnaire.
As far as the Election signs go if new ones are made they should recyclable. Coroplast signs can be potentially be recycled at Durham Shred & Recycle, Contact: (905) 571-4826
Address: 651 Drake St Oshawa, ON, L1H7R3
Thank you
Ajax Council
I am proud to be a resident of the Town of Ajax. I believe that our local council does a fantastic job at moving our community towards sustainability, environmentally as well as economically. Councillor Jordan is also an integral part of bringing these issues forward to Regional Council. I hope the 2010 elections provide some help for her in terms of new candidates who can help the Region to be as forward-thinking as the Town of Ajax. Thanks Councillor Jordan, for standing up for our community!